# |
Team |
GP |
W |
L |
W% |
ØPF |
ØPA |
ØDiff |
1. | FC Bayern München |
31 |
26 |
5 |
84% |
88.7 |
76.5 |
+12.2 |
2. | Chemnitz |
32 |
24 |
8 |
75% |
89.3 |
79.6 |
+9.8 |
3. | Alba Berlin |
31 |
24 |
7 |
77% |
90.2 |
82.0 |
+8.2 |
4. | S.Oliver Baskets |
32 |
23 |
9 |
72% |
87.2 |
80.0 |
+7.2 |
5. | Ratiopharm Ulm |
32 |
22 |
10 |
69% |
90.9 |
84.0 |
+6.8 |
6. | Rasta Vechta |
32 |
20 |
12 |
62% |
88.7 |
82.4 |
+6.3 |
7. | Telekom Baskets Bonn |
32 |
19 |
13 |
59% |
90.2 |
86.2 |
+4.0 |
8. | EnBW Ludwigsburg |
32 |
18 |
14 |
56% |
88.6 |
82.7 |
+5.9 |
9. | Oldenburg |
32 |
17 |
15 |
53% |
85.4 |
83.6 |
+1.8 |
10. | Braunschweig |
32 |
15 |
17 |
47% |
82.4 |
84.7 |
-2.3 |
11. | Hamburg |
32 |
15 |
17 |
47% |
85.6 |
87.1 |
-1.6 |
12. | Brose Baskets |
32 |
14 |
18 |
44% |
88.5 |
90.1 |
-1.6 |
13. | Rostock Seawolves |
32 |
9 |
23 |
28% |
87.7 |
93.1 |
-5.4 |
14. | BG Göttingen |
32 |
10 |
22 |
31% |
85.8 |
93.0 |
-7.2 |
15. | Mitteldeutscher BC |
32 |
10 |
22 |
31% |
85.8 |
93.3 |
-7.4 |
16. | USC Heidelberg |
32 |
8 |
24 |
25% |
82.5 |
93.7 |
-11.2 |
17. | Crailsheim Merlins |
32 |
7 |
25 |
22% |
81.1 |
92.9 |
-11.9 |
18. | Walter Tigers Tübing |
32 |
6 |
26 |
19% |
82.5 |
95.5 |
-12.9 |
# |
Team |
GP |
W |
L |
W% |
ØPF |
ØPA |
ØDiff |
1. | FC Bayern München |
16 |
15 |
1 |
94% |
89.9 |
74.1 |
+15.8 |
2. | Alba Berlin |
15 |
14 |
1 |
93% |
95.9 |
81.3 |
+14.7 |
3. | Chemnitz |
15 |
12 |
3 |
80% |
87.5 |
75.4 |
+12.1 |
4. | Ratiopharm Ulm |
16 |
11 |
5 |
69% |
91.3 |
87.2 |
+4.1 |
5. | S.Oliver Baskets |
16 |
11 |
5 |
69% |
86.2 |
78.0 |
+8.2 |
6. | Telekom Baskets Bonn |
16 |
11 |
5 |
69% |
91.1 |
83.9 |
+7.2 |
7. | Oldenburg |
16 |
10 |
6 |
62% |
86.1 |
82.9 |
+3.2 |
8. | Braunschweig |
16 |
10 |
6 |
62% |
87.8 |
85.4 |
+2.3 |
9. | Rasta Vechta |
16 |
10 |
6 |
62% |
88.2 |
81.2 |
+7.0 |
10. | EnBW Ludwigsburg |
16 |
10 |
6 |
62% |
89.2 |
82.3 |
+6.9 |
11. | Brose Baskets |
16 |
9 |
7 |
56% |
89.0 |
85.8 |
+3.2 |
12. | Hamburg |
16 |
8 |
8 |
50% |
84.9 |
84.9 |
0.0 |
13. | BG Göttingen |
16 |
8 |
8 |
50% |
89.1 |
92.4 |
-3.4 |
14. | Rostock Seawolves |
16 |
6 |
10 |
38% |
89.1 |
94.2 |
-5.1 |
15. | Mitteldeutscher BC |
17 |
6 |
11 |
35% |
87.4 |
94.2 |
-6.8 |
16. | Crailsheim Merlins |
16 |
6 |
10 |
38% |
82.4 |
90.4 |
-8.0 |
17. | USC Heidelberg |
16 |
4 |
12 |
25% |
81.1 |
92.8 |
-11.8 |
18. | Walter Tigers Tübing |
16 |
3 |
13 |
19% |
83.3 |
94.8 |
-11.4 |
# |
Team |
GP |
W |
L |
W% |
ØPF |
ØPA |
ØDiff |
1. | Chemnitz |
17 |
12 |
5 |
71% |
90.9 |
83.2 |
+7.7 |
2. | S.Oliver Baskets |
16 |
12 |
4 |
75% |
88.1 |
82.1 |
+6.1 |
3. | Ratiopharm Ulm |
16 |
11 |
5 |
69% |
90.4 |
80.9 |
+9.6 |
4. | FC Bayern München |
15 |
11 |
4 |
73% |
87.5 |
79.1 |
+8.4 |
5. | Rasta Vechta |
16 |
10 |
6 |
62% |
89.2 |
83.6 |
+5.6 |
6. | Alba Berlin |
16 |
10 |
6 |
62% |
84.8 |
82.8 |
+2.1 |
7. | EnBW Ludwigsburg |
16 |
8 |
8 |
50% |
88.1 |
83.1 |
+4.9 |
8. | Telekom Baskets Bonn |
16 |
8 |
8 |
50% |
89.3 |
88.6 |
+0.8 |
9. | Oldenburg |
16 |
7 |
9 |
44% |
84.7 |
84.3 |
+0.4 |
10. | Hamburg |
16 |
7 |
9 |
44% |
86.2 |
89.3 |
-3.1 |
11. | Brose Baskets |
16 |
5 |
11 |
31% |
87.9 |
94.3 |
-6.4 |
12. | Braunschweig |
16 |
5 |
11 |
31% |
77.1 |
83.9 |
-6.9 |
13. | USC Heidelberg |
16 |
4 |
12 |
25% |
83.9 |
94.6 |
-10.6 |
14. | Rostock Seawolves |
16 |
3 |
13 |
19% |
86.2 |
91.9 |
-5.6 |
15. | Mitteldeutscher BC |
15 |
4 |
11 |
27% |
84.1 |
92.3 |
-8.2 |
16. | Walter Tigers Tübing |
16 |
3 |
13 |
19% |
81.8 |
96.2 |
-14.4 |
17. | BG Göttingen |
16 |
2 |
14 |
12% |
82.6 |
93.6 |
-11.1 |
18. | Crailsheim Merlins |
16 |
1 |
15 |
6% |
79.7 |
95.4 |
-15.8 |
Click on any column to sort table Mouseover percentages (%) to see value odds | Select Season
Official Site
Wikipedia |