# |
Equipo |
PJ |
PG |
PP |
PG% |
ØPF |
ØPC |
ØDG |
1. | FC Bayern München |
30 |
25 |
5 |
83% |
89.1 |
77.3 |
+11.8 |
2. | Alba Berlin |
30 |
24 |
6 |
80% |
91.4 |
82.2 |
+9.2 |
3. | Chemnitz |
31 |
23 |
8 |
74% |
89.5 |
79.6 |
+9.9 |
4. | S.Oliver Baskets |
31 |
22 |
9 |
71% |
86.8 |
79.7 |
+7.1 |
5. | Ratiopharm Ulm |
31 |
21 |
10 |
68% |
91.5 |
84.9 |
+6.5 |
6. | Rasta Vechta |
31 |
19 |
12 |
61% |
89.0 |
82.7 |
+6.3 |
7. | Telekom Baskets Bonn |
31 |
19 |
12 |
61% |
90.2 |
85.8 |
+4.4 |
8. | EnBW Ludwigsburg |
31 |
18 |
13 |
58% |
88.6 |
82.5 |
+6.1 |
9. | Oldenburg |
31 |
16 |
15 |
52% |
85.6 |
84.3 |
+1.4 |
10. | Hamburg |
31 |
15 |
16 |
48% |
85.8 |
87.2 |
-1.4 |
11. | Braunschweig |
31 |
14 |
17 |
45% |
82.6 |
85.2 |
-2.5 |
12. | Brose Baskets |
31 |
13 |
18 |
42% |
87.8 |
90.3 |
-2.5 |
13. | Rostock Seawolves |
31 |
9 |
22 |
29% |
88.3 |
93.6 |
-5.4 |
14. | BG Göttingen |
31 |
10 |
21 |
32% |
86.2 |
93.4 |
-7.3 |
15. | Mitteldeutscher BC |
31 |
9 |
22 |
29% |
85.7 |
93.4 |
-7.7 |
16. | USC Heidelberg |
31 |
8 |
23 |
26% |
83.3 |
94.4 |
-11.0 |
17. | Crailsheim Merlins |
31 |
7 |
24 |
23% |
81.0 |
92.4 |
-11.4 |
18. | Walter Tigers Tübing |
31 |
6 |
25 |
19% |
83.2 |
96.0 |
-12.8 |
# |
Equipo |
PJ |
PG |
PP |
PG% |
ØPF |
ØPC |
ØDG |
1. | FC Bayern München |
15 |
14 |
1 |
93% |
90.7 |
75.5 |
+15.2 |
2. | Alba Berlin |
15 |
14 |
1 |
93% |
95.9 |
81.3 |
+14.7 |
3. | Chemnitz |
15 |
12 |
3 |
80% |
87.5 |
75.4 |
+12.1 |
4. | Ratiopharm Ulm |
16 |
11 |
5 |
69% |
91.3 |
87.2 |
+4.1 |
5. | S.Oliver Baskets |
16 |
11 |
5 |
69% |
86.2 |
78.0 |
+8.2 |
6. | Telekom Baskets Bonn |
15 |
11 |
4 |
73% |
91.1 |
82.8 |
+8.3 |
7. | EnBW Ludwigsburg |
16 |
10 |
6 |
62% |
89.2 |
82.3 |
+6.9 |
8. | Oldenburg |
15 |
9 |
6 |
60% |
86.6 |
84.2 |
+2.4 |
9. | Braunschweig |
15 |
9 |
6 |
60% |
88.5 |
86.5 |
+2.1 |
10. | Rasta Vechta |
15 |
9 |
6 |
60% |
88.7 |
81.7 |
+7.1 |
11. | Brose Baskets |
16 |
9 |
7 |
56% |
89.0 |
85.8 |
+3.2 |
12. | Hamburg |
15 |
8 |
7 |
53% |
85.3 |
84.9 |
+0.4 |
13. | BG Göttingen |
16 |
8 |
8 |
50% |
89.1 |
92.4 |
-3.4 |
14. | Rostock Seawolves |
16 |
6 |
10 |
38% |
89.1 |
94.2 |
-5.1 |
15. | Crailsheim Merlins |
15 |
6 |
9 |
40% |
82.5 |
89.2 |
-6.7 |
16. | Mitteldeutscher BC |
16 |
5 |
11 |
31% |
87.2 |
94.4 |
-7.2 |
17. | USC Heidelberg |
15 |
4 |
11 |
27% |
82.7 |
94.1 |
-11.5 |
18. | Walter Tigers Tübing |
16 |
3 |
13 |
19% |
83.3 |
94.8 |
-11.4 |
# |
Equipo |
PJ |
PG |
PP |
PG% |
ØPF |
ØPC |
ØDG |
1. | FC Bayern München |
15 |
11 |
4 |
73% |
87.5 |
79.1 |
+8.4 |
2. | Chemnitz |
16 |
11 |
5 |
69% |
91.3 |
83.5 |
+7.8 |
3. | S.Oliver Baskets |
15 |
11 |
4 |
73% |
87.3 |
81.5 |
+5.9 |
4. | Ratiopharm Ulm |
15 |
10 |
5 |
67% |
91.6 |
82.5 |
+9.1 |
5. | Rasta Vechta |
16 |
10 |
6 |
62% |
89.2 |
83.6 |
+5.6 |
6. | Alba Berlin |
15 |
10 |
5 |
67% |
86.9 |
83.1 |
+3.8 |
7. | EnBW Ludwigsburg |
15 |
8 |
7 |
53% |
87.9 |
82.6 |
+5.3 |
8. | Telekom Baskets Bonn |
16 |
8 |
8 |
50% |
89.3 |
88.6 |
+0.8 |
9. | Oldenburg |
16 |
7 |
9 |
44% |
84.7 |
84.3 |
+0.4 |
10. | Hamburg |
16 |
7 |
9 |
44% |
86.2 |
89.3 |
-3.1 |
11. | Braunschweig |
16 |
5 |
11 |
31% |
77.1 |
83.9 |
-6.9 |
12. | Brose Baskets |
15 |
4 |
11 |
27% |
86.5 |
95.1 |
-8.6 |
13. | USC Heidelberg |
16 |
4 |
12 |
25% |
83.9 |
94.6 |
-10.6 |
14. | Rostock Seawolves |
15 |
3 |
12 |
20% |
87.3 |
92.9 |
-5.6 |
15. | Mitteldeutscher BC |
15 |
4 |
11 |
27% |
84.1 |
92.3 |
-8.2 |
16. | Walter Tigers Tübing |
15 |
3 |
12 |
20% |
83.0 |
97.3 |
-14.3 |
17. | BG Göttingen |
15 |
2 |
13 |
13% |
83.1 |
94.5 |
-11.4 |
18. | Crailsheim Merlins |
16 |
1 |
15 |
6% |
79.7 |
95.4 |
-15.8 |
Haga clic en cualquier columna para ordenar la tabla Porcentajes mouseover (%) para ver las probabilidades de valor | Seleccione una temporada
Sitio web oficial
Wikipedia |